Using an Xcode compression that takes 36.4GB and compresses it down to 17GB they received the following: That makes the MacBook Air a lot more responsive for daily tasks. Using Speedometer 2.0 you get the following results: Moving into more practical testing we see what happens when you optimize your software and hardware. It is an objectively more powerful computer in most regards. The Mac Pro is taking away a lot of wins in this round of testing. Moving into the more generalized Geekbench we see some of the benefits of Apple’s Silicon’s optimizations. It’s certainly an interesting way to put these scores into perspective. When compared on a per Watt basis this puts the MacBook Air at 400 points per W compared to the Pro’s 73 points per W. This has been a key selling point of Apple Silicon. To get that 76% increase in performance it required 193W compared to the measly 20W of the Air. Unsurprisingly the 12-core Xeon in the Mac Pro is more powerful. This is the classic test for computers when it comes to video editing so let’s see how they both do: It is the one that Max Tech recommends for most people. You’ll actually notice that the MacBook Air isn’t even the top-of-the-line spec. Here are the specs of each before we get started: This is going to be a mix of benchmarks and real-world testing to see how each computer handles their workloads. Max Tech has been doing some great testing and this should be exciting. The M2 chip may just be as good as or even better than Intel-based machines like the $15,000 Mac Pro shown here. In theory this shouldn’t even be a contest and once you factor in price you wouldn’t think it would be worth doing.Īpple silicon has upended everything. This one seems fun though, taking the new M2-equipped MacBook Air and pitting it against the super pricey and (supposedly) ultra-powerful Mac Pro. New chips and new MacBooks mean a lot of testing is on the way.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |